Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Mark 12:35-44: Why I never liked P.D.A.


It’s fitting that before Jesus launches into a discussion of religion and worship, he makes a brief but significant comment on the object of our worship.  In an effort to pry open the minds and imaginations of His hearers, Jesus throws out a rhetorical question, basing its query in scripture.  “How can the scribes say that the Christ is the son of David?”  The scribes were looking for an heir to David, to reclaim David’s throne.  While understandable, this turns out to be misguided in that it fails to account for the scope and grandiosity of God’s plan.  Jesus quotes Psalm 110:1 where David refers to the Messiah as his “Lord”, and asks “why would David refer to his heir as his Lord?”  The only commentary we receive on the exchange in Mark’s gospel is that the people “heard him gladly.”  Of course, it was ultimately this message that would get Jesus killed, but people’s reception of the message doesn’t change the validity or truth of the claim itself.  God’s plan for our world is far grander than we can imagine, and our worship should reflect our appreciation for the grace and mercy that is the result of that plan, as well as our love for the God who would put such a costly plan into motion. 

When we understand Jesus’ point about the Messiah, in terms of who the Messiah would be, and also what he would accomplish, it should shape how we worship.  Such was not the case with the scribes he mentions in the next section.  What is their worship, their religion about?  It’s about places of honor; it’s about occupying center stage, so that they become the center of attention.  They crave markers of deference and pretense, markers that are condemned by Jesus.  Why?  Because religious leaders aren’t supposed to be above the community, they are supposed to be a part of the community.  They aren’t to be apart from the community, they are to be among the community.  The scribes Jesus’ referred to longed for prestige and respect, that could then be transformed into material support, hence Jesus’ comment about “devouring widow’s houses”.  Instead of serving those at the margins of society, the religious leaders were living off of them.  When Jesus speaks of their prayer life, it makes perfect sense why they would act this way.  We see that their prayers were aimed not at God, the rightful object of our devotion, but at the people around them.  They weren’t talking to God, so much as speaking to those around them.  Prayer had become a convenient way of manifesting self-centered religion.  We see from their example what religion isn’t about, but that doesn’t tell us who it is about.

We all know that the answer to the question “who is our religion about?” is God, but knowing the answer, and knowing how to reflect that answer in our lives is two different things.  To help us understand what it means to give ourselves over to God fully, Jesus tells a story about a poor widow and the offering she makes at the temple.  In those days, the temple had trumpet-shaped receptacles, in which people would deposit their offering.  Larger offerings of bronze coins would make more noise, and draw attention.  (It makes me kind of glad that most offerings in churches are now made with more stealthy paper currency or with checks).  When the rich came to pour in their large offerings, it probably sounded like someone hitting the jackpot in a casino.  I’m sure that in more than one instance, the approving looks of respect were more of a motivating factor than a desire to honor God when such large contributions were made.  The offering of the widow, unlike the offerings of the rich, probably made very little noise, if any.  No one’s attention was drawn by the clanging of those two small coins hitting the trumpet-shaped receptacle.  But something tells me that was ok with her.  I don’t think she walked up to drop in those coins, hoping that others would notice and talk about how wonderful she was.  I think she gave those two coins- and the fact that there were two means she could have kept one, and still given 50% of what she had, no paltry percentage- motivated by her love for her God.  She was giving out of her necessity, what she needed to live on, rather than out of her surplus, and Jesus uses that to illustrate the point that true contributions are measured not by quantity, but by how much of ourselves we give.

We can learn two things from the widow, and if we take those things to heart they will dramatically alter how we approach worship, and how we approach our faith.  First of all, our worship should be God-centered.  I fear that too many times we worship with one eye on God, and another on those around us.  Our worship becomes the religious version of over-the-top PDA that we’ve all witnessed and been disgusted by at some point or another.  Such overt “public displays of affection” are usually about grabbing attention, not displaying affection, and they usually come from a place of deep insecurity.  Does that mean we never worship in public?  Of course not!  It simply means that our affection for God, not getting attention from others, should be what drives our worship and our faith.  The other thing we can learn is that all of us have something to offer God.  Too often we feel like the widow, standing there looking at the meager coins in our hand thinking that they will never make a difference.  I’d argue that those two small coins might not have helped the temple make budget that month, but the devotion that they reflected was worth far more than any amount of money she could have poured into the offering box.  God isn’t looking for people who can give a lot of what they have; he’s looking for those who are willing to give all of who they are.    

No comments:

Post a Comment