Monday, October 22, 2012

Mark 16:1-8: the end that is still being written


How do we tell the Easter story, the story of Jesus’ resurrection?  The varied ways of telling the “greatest story ever told” are evident by the contrasting ways that the gospel writers tell us of the same event.  In Matthew, we read of an earthquake, terrified guards, and Jesus meeting the women after they leave the tomb.  In Luke, Peter is shown running to the tomb, disciples encounter Jesus on the road to Emmaus, and then that same Jesus appears to a larger gathering of disciples.  When we read John’s gospel, we see a Thomas full of doubt, and Jesus meeting with the disciple by the seashore.  We place Mark’s gospel next to all of these, and we discover that we aren’t even sure where the gospel in fact ends.  The only common thread in all these various accounts is the visiting of the tomb by the women.    

Despite its brevity when compared to the other gospels, Mark’s resurrection story does teach us some important things- not only about Jesus, but about our faith as well.  First of all, the women who visit the tomb are seeking the crucified Jesus, rather than the resurrected Lord.  This is more than understandable, as they were there for Jesus crucifixion.  These three women all saw the death of Jesus (Mark 15:40), and the two Mary’s were there for Jesus burial (Mark 15:47).  Despite their confidence in what they have witnessed the young man, who is most assuredly an angel, instructs them that they are looking for Jesus in the wrong place.   His statement that Jesus “was crucified” has the ring of a Christian confession, as the crucifixion is now in the past.  More than that, the testimony continues beyond Jesus recently endured crucifixion, to state that “he has been raised.”  Jesus death been overcome by life, by resurrection, and it is God who has accomplished this, as is made clear by the fact that “has been raised” is cast in the passive. 
Where do we seek Jesus?  As important as the crucifixion is for us, for our redemption, it is firmly in the past.  The cross is important, even vital to our spiritual lives, but the power it possesses to shape us comes not from Jesus death, but from His resurrection.       

Of course, that power is only relevant if we believe the word about Jesus that we hear.  In the words of the author of Hebrews, “faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.” (Hebrews 11:1)  To that end, there is no dispute that the tomb was empty.  If Jesus’ body had remained in the tomb, stating that fact would have been the easiest and most logical way to undercut the power of the Christian message.  After all, as Paul would tell the Corinthians, “if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain.” (I Corinthians 15:14)  In other words, if Christianity’s early opponents could discredit the resurrection, they would have all but discredited the entire faith.   And yet, with that being the case, in all the early Jewish polemic against Christianity, the empty tomb is never disputed, nor is Jesus’ body produced. 
The real thrust behind the news of Jesus resurrection is not just the indisputable fact that the tomb was empty.  The power lays in the fact that Jesus’ followers saw in this action, in Jesus’ resurrection, a fulfillment of what God had promised to do all along.  The prophet Hosea would foretell the event centuries earlier, when he said: “After two days he will revive us; on the third day he will raise us up, that we may live before him.” (Hosea 6:2)  Jesus himself hints at an interpretive lens through which we should we view both the crucifixion and the resurrection, when he says as he hangs on the cross, “my God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”  By quoting the first verse of Psalm 22, a psalm that begins with such anguish and pain, he is pointing us forward to the end of the psalm, to an ending characterized by renewal, and even resurrection.    
Like the women, we are left with an empty tomb.  The question is, what will we do with it?  Will we believe that word of revelation that interprets the empty tomb, and infuses it with meaning? 

Embracing that word of revelation is more than a mental or intellectual exercise.  The women are told to go and tell the disciples and Peter, the news of the resurrection.  In short, they are to take the news to those who need to hear it the most.  Those who abandoned and even denied Jesus are rehabilitated.  The lack of closure in the gospel is intentional and draws us into the story, giving us the task of interpreting the rest of what has, and indeed what will happen.  In essence, the gospel tasks us with writing an end to the story through our own faithfulness.  D. English would write that “our first century forebears in the faith were not naturally superior (or inferior) to us.  Neither did faith and discipleship come any easier for them.  Yet despite all, they went on believing and laid the foundation for us.”  The question is, like them, will we embrace faith and discipleship in spite of the cost?  Will we build on the foundation laid by them, a foundation grounded in the blood of Jesus Christ, and the power of His resurrection?

No comments:

Post a Comment