After
countless blogs on the gospel of Mark, I have transitioned to I Peter. The reasoning behind the decision is
simple. When we read I Peter, we are
reading the testimony of the same man we saw bumbling his way through the
gospel of Mark. Who was Peter?
-
He was one of the first ones called to be a
follower of Jesus Christ. He was called
with his brother Andrew. He had been
there from the beginning.
-
He had accompanied Jesus throughout his
ministry, and had heard his teaching on multiple occasions
-
He had also experienced his share of setbacks,
disappointments, and even failures.
In many ways Peter is like us. Things don’t always go the way he wants. Sometimes he is his own worst enemy. And yet, what we’ll see from this letter is
quite simple. Peter has changed. The resurrection has prompted Peter to
respond in ways we would have thought unimaginable while reading Mark. He still isn’t perfect, but when we listen
closely we can hear the words of Christ in Peter’s writing, and we can see how
his entire outlook has been radically altered because of the power of the Holy
Spirit working in his life.
So
with all this in mind, we sit up and take notice when Peter says that we are
“born again to a living hope”. We talked
about how Peter had things in his past, things he wished he could undo, or
redo. I can’t help but wonder if as he
writes this phrase, he doesn’t think of those low-points in his life- the
boasting, the violence, the denial. If
anyone understood the power of being born again, of having a living hope, it
was Peter. There is no doubt that he
delighted in this phrase, “he has caused us to be born again to a living hope
through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead.” That implies more than a fresh start, it
implies a different start. Becoming a
Christian isn’t about getting a mulligan.
It’s not a second chance to get things right, it’s coming to the
understanding that we can’t get things right on our own. In John 3 Jesus tells Nicodemus that we must
be born again/from above. For whatever
reason, the translators usually chose either “born again” or “from above”,
subjecting the alternative to the footnotes.
However, I don’t think Jesus was using the word because of its
ambiguity, but because of the dual meaning inherent in the word itself. We can’t only be born again, because then we
would be destined to re-live our life in the same limited way we did the first
go around. Similarly, we can’t be born
just “from above”, because that fails to reckon with our need for renewal.
So
what does this look like in Peter’s life?
Peter didn’t like it in Mark’s gospel, when Jesus mentioned the Messiah
suffering. Peter’s concept of the
Messiah probably included Jesus riding a large war horse, not a donkey; it
involved him sitting on a throne, not hanging on a cross. And yet here we read of Peter describing an
eternal kingdom well worth the enduring of temporary suffering, and momentary
trials. The inheritance of the Christian
who perseveres is incorruptible, in that it will not rot or decay. It is undefiled, in that it is morally and
religiously pure, not requiring us to compromise our morals in order to obtain
it. And it is unfading, in that its
beauty doesn’t slowly slip away like that of a flower.
It
would seem from reading this letter that Peter has come to realize the value of
trusting in what we cannot see. I am
reminded from a scene in Indiana Jones
and the Last Crusade, where Indiana comes to a pivotal point in his quest
to find and rescue his father. Before
him stands a large chasm, a chasm that can be traversed only by a narrow
foot-bridge. The problem is, the
footbridge is invisible. Motivated by
his love for his father, Indiana takes what is literally a step of faith. Just when it appears he will fall to his
death deep into the dark void, his foot lands upon the unseen ledge. After walking across, he turns and throws
dirt on the bridge, a visual reminder that though unseen, the bridge is in fact
there. It’s a move we all have to make
in our faith. It’s a move we see Peter making
in the gospel of Mark, thus all his fumbling around. He hears Jesus echo those famous words,
“where your treasure is, there your heart will be also”, and over time the
meaning of them slowly sinks in. Finally,
as we read the words of his epistle, we see that though he is still not
perfect, he has shifted the location of his treasure, away from a worldly way
of thinking, and toward a kingdom of God way of thinking.
It’s
a shift we are all called to make, indeed it’s a shift Peter is exhorting the
troubled recipients of his letter to remain commited to. It’s not that Peter has given up on the idea
of a crown of glory, it’s just he’s come to embrace the paradox that we
do not, that we cannot receive the crown of glory, without the crown of thorns.
No comments:
Post a Comment